果冻传媒app官方

Table of Contents

FIREReturn to Campus During Contentious Election Season with FIREon Their Side

FIREBack to School 2016

PHILADELPHIA, August 29, 2016鈥擳he Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) routinely receives reports from students about colleges censoring political speech during election season. As a new academic year begins, FIREreminds students and administrators that political expression lies at the heart of free speech protections鈥攁nd FIREstands ready to defend it.

A number of schools have already threatened or restricted political speech on campus during this election cycle:

  • Last fall, Georgetown University Law Center administrators prevented a group of students supporting Senator Bernie Sanders鈥 presidential campaign from tabling inside or outside the school. After FIREintervened with a letter to the school, Georgetown reversed its decision.
  • Also last fall, American University (AU) administrators denied a request from a student group supporting the presidential campaign of Rand Paul from gaining official recognition and banned the group from petitioning in support of Paul鈥檚 campaign on campus. After FIREintervened with a letter to the school, AU agreed to commit to allowing partisan political groups to gain official recognition.
  • In April, DePaul University grounds workers on campus because some members of the crews considered the messages 鈥渋nflammatory.鈥 DePaul subsequently banned all partisan political chalking on campus.
  • Emory University made headlines earlier this year when President James Wagner said chalkings in support of Donald Trump on campus would be investigated after students complained that the political messages made them feel unsafe. Emory later backed off its investigation.

鈥淓very election cycle, colleges and universities like DePaul, Georgetown, and American mistakenly claim that their nonprofit status requires that they ban political speech on campus,鈥 said FIREExecutive Director Robert Shibley. 鈥淭hat鈥檚 patently untrue. Political activity restrictions apply to the institution itself, not to students or student groups. Schools that promise free speech rights to their students must deliver them, and not hide behind bogus and tired arguments for censorship.鈥

In March, FIREjoined Georgetown law student Alex Atkins in testifying before the U.S. House Ways and Means Oversight Subcommittee about censorship of political speech on campus. In her written testimony, FIREDirector of Litigation Catherine Sevcenko outlined the 13 times since 2008 when FIREintervened after schools cited their tax-exempt status to justify censoring student political speech鈥攁nd that number continues to grow.

For those interested in learning more about the protections afforded to political speech on campus, 果冻传媒app官方鈥檚 newly updated Policy Statement on Political Speech on Campus provides a comprehensive overview of the rights students and faculty have when speaking out on a political candidate or party. Relatedly, 果冻传媒app官方鈥檚 new FAQ for Student Protests on Campus answers common questions about students鈥 rights when demonstrating.

FIRE and faculty who believe their political speech rights have been violated on campus can contact FIREthrough our easy-to-use case submission page.

The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (果冻传媒app官方) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit student rights organization dedicated to defending liberty, freedom of speech, due process, academic freedom, legal equality, and freedom of conscience on America鈥檚 college campuses.

CONTACT:

Katie Barrows, Communications Coordinator, 果冻传媒app官方: 215-717-3473; media@thefire.org

Recent Articles

FIRE鈥檚 award-winning Newsdesk covers the free speech news you need to stay informed.

Share