Table of Contents
Ward Churchill Decision Today
The University of Colorado Board of Regents will be . Churchill first came under fire because he referred to some victims of September 11th as 鈥渓ittle Eichmanns,鈥 but was later investigated for supposed research misconduct and plagiarism. Back in 2005, when the controversy originally erupted, FIREdefended Churchill鈥檚 free speech rights and issued a comprehensive analysis of the situation. In that analysis we also addressed the suggestion that the academic misconduct charges should be dropped because the initial investigation improperly targeted his opinions:
FIREcannot, however, agree with those who argue that Churchill should not be the subject of any adverse job action simply because the Board of Regents鈥 initial investigation was improper. The recent allegations of research misconduct have come from citizens doing their own, independent, inquiries into Churchill鈥檚 background. Ward Churchill has a right to speak, but鈥攐nce he injects himself into the public square through his teachings, writings, and speeches鈥攈e cannot insulate himself from public scrutiny. If that scrutiny results in the release of information that harms his credibility or legitimately places his job in jeopardy, then that is simply the hazard of voluntarily participating in the marketplace of ideas.
Make sure to stay tuned for further updates as this situation develops today
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from 果冻传媒app官方.

FIREstatement on UT-Dallas student newspaper distribution

VICTORY! University of North Texas system lifts drag 鈥榩ause鈥 after 果冻传媒app官方/ACLU of TX letter

How sure are you?
