果冻传媒app官方

Table of Contents

Speak up, get expelled: the Eastman way

A doctoral student at the University of Rochester鈥檚 Eastman School of Music spoke out about sexual harassment and retaliation. Eastman expelled her.
Rebecca Bryant Novak

Smiley Photography

Rebecca Bryant Novak

During her first semester pursuing a doctorate in conducting at the University of Rochester鈥檚 Eastman School of Music, Rebecca Bryant Novak reported sexual harassment by Professor Neil Varon and asked that the school limit her contact with Varon. But Senior Associate Dean and Title IX Coordinator John Hain rejected her request. According to Bryant Novak, Hain said the school trusted Varon 鈥 because he鈥檚 faculty 鈥 and told her to consider transferring somewhere else. 

In May 2024, Bryant Novak published their exchange on . Hain鈥檚 response? He threatened her with a defamation lawsuit.  

So she reported Hain鈥檚 handling of the complaint to the university鈥檚 administration and, after a yearlong investigation, the university determined Varon had indeed violated its  鈥 and that Eastman had badly mishandled Bryant Novak鈥檚 complaint. 

Yet Eastman allowed Varon to retain oversight of Bryant Novak鈥檚 academic trajectory. It restricted her performance times, allowing her to avoid him but costing her conducting opportunities. When she protested, Eastman did nothing. 

Running out of options, Bryant Novak once again escalated her complaint about Eastman鈥檚 alleged retaliation to the University of Rochester, Eastman鈥檚 parent institution. The university launched a second investigation of Eastman in December 2024. 

In February, Bryant Novak wrote about it on her Substack. Days later, Eastman expelled her. 

University of Rochester doctoral student Rebecca Bryant Novak

Tell Rochester to Stop Muzzling its 果冻传媒app官方

Take Action

Tell the University of Rochester: Reinstate Rebecca Bryant Novak, restore due process, and stop muzzling students into a culture of silence.

Read More

The school cited Bryant Novak鈥檚 supposed failure to make academic progress in its expulsion letter. Yet Eastman completely disregarded its own  regarding academic progress reviews. Apparently, just days after she took her complaints public, Eastman鈥檚 alleged concerns about Bryant Novak suddenly became so acute that it felt it needed to just go ahead and entirely skip over the two-semester review process required by its own policies before dismissal. 

Bryant Novak got no warning. No appeal. And the range of allegations Eastman cited for her expulsion didn鈥檛 even meet the  to put a student on warning status, let alone dismiss them. FIREhas plenty of experience in investigating cases, but one does not need to be Sherlock Holmes to figure out what was going on with Eastman and Bryant Novak.

Today, FIREwrote a letter to the University of Rochester, urging it to reinstate Bryant Novak: 

Eastman鈥檚 failure to follow its own policy in any respect, the temporal proximity of Bryant Novak鈥檚 dismissal to her public disclosure of Rochester鈥檚 investigation, and Eastman鈥檚 contentious history with Bryant Novak 鈥 including Hain鈥檚 lawsuit threat against Bryant Novak and the conflict of interest inherent in allowing Hain鈥檚 direct report, Ardizzone, to retain authority over Bryant Novak鈥檚 academic standing 鈥 all strongly suggest that Bryant Novak鈥檚 dismissal was retaliation for speech explicitly protected by Rochester policies.

The University of Rochester is a private institution, which means that unlike public universities, it is not a government actor obligated to uphold constitutional free speech rights. Nevertheless, it  students protection for their speech 鈥 including protection from retaliation for complaining about harassment. 

But no one protected Bryant Novak. When she spoke out about harassment, Eastman retaliated. When she protested the retaliation, Eastman expelled her. Let鈥檚 tell the University of Rochester to reinstate Bryant Novak and provide her the due process it promises all its students. 

Eastman tried to make her story an example. Instead, it should be a rallying cry.

 

FIRE defends the rights of students and faculty members 鈥 no matter their views 鈥 at public and private universities and colleges in the United States. If you are a student or a faculty member facing investigation or punishment for your speech, . If you鈥檙e faculty member at a public college or university, call the Faculty Legal Defense Fund 24-hour hotline at 254-500-FLDF (3533). If you鈥檙e a college journalist facing censorship or a media law question, call the Student Press Freedom Initiative 24-hour hotline at 717-734-SPFI (7734).

Recent Articles

Get the latest free speech news and analysis from 果冻传媒app官方.

Share