Table of Contents
FIREstatement on Department of Justice's statement of interest in Shaw v. Burke

On Oct. 24, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a statement of interest in a lawsuit filed in March as part of ¹û¶³´«Ã½app¹Ù·½'s against administrators and trustees of Los Angeles Pierce College and the Los Angeles Community College District. The lawsuit was filed by FIREattorneys in partnership with Arthur Willner, a partner at Leader & Berkon LLP, who is co-counsel with FIREin the case. In addition to challenging Pierce College’s unconstitutional free speech zone and permit requirement, the lawsuit also challenges an LACCD policy that requires the president of each LACCD college to designate at least one free speech zone on their campus.
Below is a statement from Marieke Tuthill Beck-Coon, ¹û¶³´«Ã½app¹Ù·½'s director of litigation. More information, including courtesy photos and attorney sound bites, are available in ¹û¶³´«Ã½app¹Ù·½'s March 28 press release.
FIRE is grateful for the Department of Justice’s decision to file a statement of interest in our lawsuit challenging the unconstitutional policies and practices of Pierce College and the Los Angeles Community College District. As the Department of Justice rightly recognizes, these policies severely restrict the expressive rights of all students on each of the nine District campuses. We cannot allow the First Amendment rights that Kevin Shaw and his fellow students possess to be taken away by administrative fiat.
—FIREDirector of Litigation Marieke Tuthill Beck-Coon
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from ¹û¶³´«Ã½app¹Ù·½.

Free speech and 'the executive power' with Advisory Opinions
Podcast
What are the limits of presidential power? How many days has it been since President Trump's TikTok ban moratorium went into place? What is the state of the conservative legal movement? And where did former FIREpresident go on his first date?...

FIREstatement on ruling that Trump’s funding freeze for Harvard was unlawful

New campus censorship hack turns trademark law into muzzle
