Table of Contents
Federal Court Orders Shippensburg University Not To Enforce āUnconstitutionalā Speech Code

SHIPPENSBURG, PAā The United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania issued a preliminary injunction on Thursday, September 4, 2003, ordering Shippensburg University President Anthony F. Ceddia not to enforce provisions of what the court termed Shippensburgās āspeech code.ā&²Ō²ś²õ±č;
The code is being challenged in a lawsuit brought by attorneys in the Legal Network of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (¹ū¶³“«Ć½app¹Ł·½). The court also denied the universityās motion to dismiss the case, allowing it to proceed to trial. Read the court order below.
āThis is a great victory and a vital step in the struggle against the scandal of unconstitutional campus censorship at public colleges and universities,ā said Thor L. Halvorssen, CEO of ¹ū¶³“«Ć½app¹Ł·½. āShippensburg faces the legal consequences of trampling the Constitution of the United States. FIREwill now seek to make this preliminary injunction permanent.ā
Shippensburg Universityās vague and overbroad speech code mandates that student speech should not āprovoke, harass, intimidate, or harm another.ā The code also outlaws certain thoughts by requiring that āevery member of the communityā mirror the official views of the university administration āin their attitudes and behaviors.ā U. S. District Judge John E. Jones III held that āthese provisions could certainly be used to truncate debate and free expression by students.ā
Judge Jones appropriately relied upon and quoted precisely the precedent case that ¹ū¶³“«Ć½app¹Ł·½ās Legal Network attorneys cited in the suit. In that 1943 Supreme Court opinion, West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette, Justice Robert Jackson wrote for the court, āIf there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what will be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein.ā
FIRE Legal Network attorneys David A. French and William Adair Bonner filed the lawsuit against Shippensburgās administration on April 22, 2003, on behalf of two Shippensburg students. The suit charges that the universityās regulations have an unconstitutional chilling effect on studentsā freedom of speech and, further, require that student speech mirror the administrationās views on certain controversial issues. The university argued that the studentsā fears were speculative and not grounded in reality. In his decision, Judge Jones agreed with ¹ū¶³“«Ć½app¹Ł·½ās analysis: āWere we to deny a preliminary injunction, the First Amendment rights of Shippensburg Universityās students would continue to be violated.ā
Judge Jonesās order stated that āit is easy to discern that the provisions of the student code in question were part of an attempt to achieve a utopian community within Shippensburg.ā The court noted, however, that good intentions do not justify censorship, explaining that the speech restrictions at Shippensburg would not be constitutional at a public high school, much less at an institution of higher learning.
Judge Jones wrote, āThe language of the Code instructs students that they must āmirrorā the Universityās ideals as they apply to racial tolerance, cultural diversity and social justice,ā a requirement that he found patently unconstitutional.
āThe fundamentally important message that Judge Jones is sending to the administrators of Shippensburg and, by implication, to other administrators of public universities around the country,ā said FIRECo-Director Harvey Silverglate, āis that student speech may not be banned merely because the listener takes offense at what is said or because student speakers wander from an official line.ā
āIt is no longer permissible for university administrators at Shippensburg to establish a single acceptable belief,ā observed FIRELegal Network attorney David A. French.
The courtās ruling is not the final word in this case. Shippensburgās President Ceddia may appeal Judge Jonesās decision to the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, which has jurisdiction over Pennsylvania and several surrounding states. āWe are confident that our First Amendment position will survive an appeal,ā added Silverglate, ābecause the Third Circuit has been a national leader in protecting First Amendment rights from efforts to censor speech in the interest of perceived ideological correctness.ā
FIRE is a nonprofit educational foundation that unites civil rights and civil liberties leaders, scholars, journalists, and public intellectuals across the political and ideological spectrum on behalf of individual rights, freedom of expression, freedom of conscience, and due process on our nationās campuses. FIREhas challenged speech codes at three colleges and universities thus far in its speech code litigation project. Please visit www.thefire.org to read more.
CONTACT:
Thor L. Halvorssen, Chief Executive Officer, ¹ū¶³“«Ć½app¹Ł·½: 215-717-3473; thor@thefire.org
Harvey A. Silverglate, Co-Director, ¹ū¶³“«Ć½app¹Ł·½: has@thefire.org
David A. French, Attorney: 859-231-8500; daf@gdm.com
William Adair Bonner, Attorney: 610-566-2703; bonneresq@aol.com
Anthony F. Ceddia, President, Shippensburg University: 717-477-1301, afcedd@ship.edu
Recent Articles
Get the latest free speech news and analysis from ¹ū¶³“«Ć½app¹Ł·½.

LAWSUIT: Texas bans the First Amendment at public universities after dark

FIREstatement on UT-Dallas student newspaper distribution

VICTORY! University of North Texas system lifts drag āpauseā after ¹ū¶³“«Ć½app¹Ł·½/ACLU of TX letter
